Australia was disarmed by a “Black Operation”, in 1996 an Individual Martin Bryant , a ‘Lone Gunman’ managed to kill over 30 people most with single kill shots to the head or Heart, the Gunman left only a half dozen wounded in this 15 minute killing spree.
It is very difficult to kill a person with a single shot , most of the ‘Massacres’ have ratios of 7 dead 15 wounded or similar.
The ‘Patsy’ was Martin Briant, a low IQ and unstable personality, he had never had SAS training or similar. Yet he managed to do single handedly what would probably take two highly trained persons. He also used a Rifle that he was not familiar with.
The result of the incident at Port Arthur an isolated Tourist spot in Tasmania (The local Police had been called to the other side of the area 30 Mins away on a bogus Heroin bust. In that time this Left Handed untrained person killed without interruption.
Australians Gun laws were on the strength of this ‘atrocity’ changed to require all owners of Full & Semi automatic Rifles and Shotguns. The owners were compensated and many collectors watched as their guns were Hydraulically crushed and tossed on a scrap pile.
This was not the end over the years we Australians have lost the right to own Cross Bows, Swords and new Legislation now allows Police to search anybody for Knives without probable cause.
The Port Arthur Massacre was a dry run for disarming a population. We Australians are a very Apathetic lot, 911 a hoax? Oh yea man so what doesn’t effect us. We as a Nation could be placed under Marshal Law or Invaded without a shot fired.
Martin Bryant was given a choice, Life without Parole and no contact with his family or a Guilty Plea that would place him in a Psychiatric Institution.
The information below is about how a "Lone Gunman" managed to kill 30+ people with mostly single kill shots to Head or Heart.. Police conveniently called to a bogus Heroin Bust.
The incident gave the Australian Government the excuse to diss-arm the Public. Now we cannot even carry a pocket Knife & subject to search by Police without cause.
I believe Australia has a purpose to the Globalists, I refuge for them with a docile gullible population that has no memory of hard times and the price of Liberty.
At this time we have no government at all. Like the UK a Hung Parliament will result. Australia is controlled by the Corporations as our X_ PM Kevin Rudd found out when he tried to Tax them beyond what they wished to pay.
T
he author OF THE MATERIAL BELOW Joe Vialls
ELAPSED TIME 15 SECONDS......... Next the very professional gunman moved towards the area of the souvenir shop and killed Nicole Burgess with a shot to the head.
Then Mrs Elizabeth Howard through the chest and arm with fatal consequences.
Swiveling around, the gunman killed Mr Leslie Lever with a shot to the head, and killed Mrs Gwenda Neader with another shot to the head.
Temporarily distracted, he fired back into the cafe area and wounded Mr Peter Crosswell, turning again he shot Mr Jason Winter twice, killing him with a shot to the head.
On his way back to the souvenir area the gunman wounded Mr Dennis Olson, then proceeded to the kill-zone near the locked door where he killed Mr Ronald Jary, Pauline Masters, and Mr Peter Nash, all of them with single shots to the head.
At this stage the gunman had killed twenty and wounded another twelve with 29 rounds,he then stopped firing and changed magazines in a most professional way.
The magazine fitted to the AR15 held 30 rounds total, so by changing magazines after firing only 29 shots the gunman ensured that he still had a live round in the breech in case anyone moved, enabling him to kill that person instantly if caught unawares.
THE PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE CONSPIRACY
"No action can really be understood apart from motive which prompted it." Arthur Schopenhauer. 1851.
It was more than the media frenzy that saturated the tabloids with sensationalism and emotional hype. The never-ending tirade of media concentration on the private lives of people who should have been left to grieve in peace was a lead up to the Prime Minister's staggering announcement to enforce new gun laws.
MURDER WEAPON HANDED IN DURING PREVIOUS AMNESTY
On the 23rd of June 1996 the Sunday Telegraph published a story about a gun collector in Victoria who identified the AR15 rifle used for the Port Arthur killings as one that he had handed in to police during an amnesty in February 1993. Strange that the weapon used in the killings just happened to fall off a conveyor belt on the way to the smelters.
”As I was to find out later, after reading what is left of Bryant's original interview, at no time has he admitted to being at Port Arthur on that day even after extensive questioning. In fact he admitted to several other incriminating events and a full confession would have made no difference to the trouble he was already in.
Even though Bryant had not been identified in any police lineup as the gunman, outrage against this man was akin to the old wild west lynch mobs. I just couldn't forget the trouble that the media went to profile Bryant, from enhancing of his photograph to make him look like a wild-eyed Manson maniac to the innuendos that his house was an arsenal for military weapons. All of this made finding an impartial jury almost impossible - perhaps that was the idea.”
TRIAL BY MEDIA ENSURED NO TRIAL BY JURY
Martin Bryant's trial was not by jury but rather by media and when he pleaded 'not guilty' the commotion that this caused indicated to me that this was not what the judicial system had in mind. In fact his plea was refused.
Bryant re-emerged at another hearing and this time pleaded guilty but strangely laughed as the names of the dead were read out. Now, if this wasn't the actions of a deranged man then perhaps it was the reaction of an innocent one. Perhaps the actions of a man who had tried to plead not guilty because, despite his instructions, he knew that this was not right. Perhaps a man who was forced to change his plea in order to satisfy the lust of the public and now found only irony in the legal system that was railroading him.
The media told us that it was obvious that Bryant was the assassin and therefore it would only cause more distress to the victims of Port Arthur if a trial by jury forced them onto the stand to testify. Never mind that another man's life was at stake. The headlines told us that he could "Rot In Hell". Never mind whether he was guilty or not. Trial or no trial everyone agreed that this eccentric half wit performed the single most devastating killing spree of the century in a style and manner that defied all reasonable explanation.
These articles eventually built into a book which he has published called DEADLY DECEPTION AT PORT ARTHUR and contains an in-depth investigation into a conspiracy almost beyond belief but backed up with scientific evidence which cannot be refuted.
Probably arising from the same "gut feelings" that I had, various other people have begun their own investigations.. Many of these investigators are amateurs in some capacity. Either having no previous experience with investigative work or very little writing ability. Their styles and avenues of discovery have come from different directions and may even conflict with each other but there is one thing that they all seem to have in common.
”They all come to the same conclusion and agree that the Port Arthur massacre was staged for a purpose and a government cover-up has resulted in the incarceration of a man who was not the murderer of 35 innocent victims on that fateful day.”
From the wealth of information gathered on these pages it is up to the reader to determine for themselves whether the traitors who disarmed our country should be allowed to get away with it.
From “ Who Ordered The Port Arthur Masssacar?”
1. On the Sunday morning, two hours before the murders, ten of the senior managers of Port Arthur were taken to safety many miles away up the east coast,for a two day seminar with a vague agenda and no visiting speakers. Was the timing of this trip a mere coincidence?
2. Also just before the shootings the only two policemen in the region were called away on a wild goose chase. They were sent to the Coal Mine at Salt Water River, to investigate a heroin drug stash which turned out to be soap powder. This was too far for them to get to the Broad Arrow Cafe in time to be of any use. Had a policeman remained at Dunalley he would have closed the swing bridge to prevent the killer(s) from escaping from the peninsula. Did Bryant, IQ 66, organise this decoy?
3. Big Mortuary Truck. Before the massacre, a specially-built 22 person capacity mortuary truck was built. It attracted some derision at the time, but its effective use at Port Arthur was unquestioned. After the massacre it was advertised, unsuccessfully, for sale via the internet, then converted for another purpose. Without the foresight of Port Arthur, why build it? When it had proven its worth, why get rid of it? Another coincidence?
4. Martin Bryant has never been properly identified as the gunman. A young woman who ate her lunch near the gunman just before 1.30 said he had a freckled face. Graham Collyer, the wounded ex-soldier, who had the best opportunity to observe the killer, said he had a pock-marked or acned face. Neither description fits Bryant who has a beautifully smooth complexion. Graham Collyer says that it was not Bryant who shot him in the neck.
5. Illegal Photo. On 30th April the Hobart Mercury printed a week old photo of Martin Bryant on the front page. This was illegal because at that stage some of the witnesses had not yet been asked to identify the killer, and the photo would have become fixed in the minds of the witnesses. When one witness was asked to describe the clothing worn by the gunman, she described the clothing on the photo instead of what the gunman had worn. The Mercury newspaper was not prosecuted for breaking the law.
6. Mrs Wendy Scurr, nurse, tour guide and Ambulance Officer, rang the police at 1.32 pm to report the shooting. She and other medics then cared for the injured and the dead without any police protection for six and a half hours. Who ordered the armed police to stop at Tarana, where they had a barbecue? The police who arrived by boats were a stone's throw away from the main crime scene, the cafe, and they too failed to come in to see what was going on. Was this meant to increase the trauma of the survivors?
7. Three more shots were fired at Port Arthur at 6.30pm while Bryant was at Seascape. Who fired those shots?
8. Same Question - Different Answer. At a recent Forensics Seminar in Queensland where the Tasmanian Police forensic gun inspector, Gerard Dutton, gave a lecture, the first question came from Mr Ian McNiven. He asked if there was any empirical evidence to link Martin Bryant to the Broad Arrow Cafe. Sargent Dutton immediately closed the 15 minute question time and would not reply. When McNiven managed to say "I have here Graham Collyer's police statement...", Sgt Dutton threatened him with arrest and called for security agents to escort McNiven out of the building. When Dutton was asked the same question in America by a Doctor at an American seminar, he replied truthfully - "There is no empirical evidence to link Bryant to the cafe".
9. Yet a police video tape exists which proves that the police had an excellent opportunity to get DNA samples and finger prints of the gunman. The video briefly shows the blue sports bag on a cafe table. The gunman had carried his 3 rifles in this bag and left it right next to his drinking glass, his Solo soft drink can, knife, fork, plate, video cameras, etc. Why did the police fail to take DNA samples and finger prints?
10. According to the official story, Bryant first killed David and Sally Martin at Seascape Cottage in the morning, then went on to Port Arthur. Yet two policemen have reported seeing a naked woman with black hair, screaming and running from one building to another at Seascape well into the afternoon. If Sally Martin was dead, who was this woman?
11. Proof of other gunmen in Seascape Cottage. While Bryant was calmly talking to police by telephone in the cottage during the 'siege' and the conversation was recorded, someone else fired an SKK rifle 20 times. In the transcript the gunfire is recorded as 'coughs' but an electronic analysis of one of the 'coughs' shows that it was an SKK shot.
12. Two More Very Handy Seminars. On the Sunday morning, some 25 specialist doctors (Royal Australian College of Surgeons) from all over Australia had attended a training course in Hobart, and their last lecture was on Terrorist Attack and Gunshot Wounds. They stayed on to take care of the wounded victims.
13. Also, more than 700 reporters from 17 nations came to a seminar in Hobart. They were asked to arrive during the week-end as the seminar was due to begin early on Monday morning. How handy to have 700 scribblers churning out their anti-gun and disarmament propaganda to the whole world!
14. "There will never be uniform Gun Laws in Australia until we see a massacre somewhere in Tasmania", said Barry Unsworth, NSW Premier, December, 1987 at a conference in Hobart. Prophecy or Planning?
15. "If we don't get it right this time (gun laws) next time there is a massacre, and there will be, then they'll take all our guns off us", said the deputy prime minister, Tim Fischer in May 1996. Who is the "THEY" who would order the removal of our guns? Did Fischer let slip that gun confiscation has been ordered by someone other than our own leaders?
16. No Respect for the Law. Our laws demand that a Coronial Inquiry must take place (a) when foreign nationals are killed (b) when anyone dies in a fire John Howard acted illegally when he ordered the Coronial Inquiry to be abandoned.
17. It is evident that the massacre was planned to happen on the ferry which sailed to the Isle of the Dead every day. The victims were to be eighty elderly American tourists who had come in two coaches. But the plan went awry because the sailing time of the ferry had changed from 1.30 to
2.00 pm.
All the preparations were made for a 1.30 massacre, so the killer began his work at the Broad Arrow Cafe at 1.30, instead of on the ferry at 2.00.
