False Flags, Gulf of Tonkin, 911, 7/7, Port Arthur, Iraq’s WMD’s,

False Flags, Gulf of Tonkin, 911, 7/7, Port Arthur, Iraq’s WMD’s,

Pentagon Debris Field After Hit By Jet

I could be excused for being frustrated and even depressed at my fellow Human Beings, supposedly educated and intelligent people are unable to wake from the slumber of Television and mainstream media dumb down, another few episodes of “Masterchef” or the Bold & the Beautiful.


I know you probably are thinking ‘I don’t watch that rubbish, ‘I have an open mind’; do you?


I think not or we would have millions on the street. This past week we buried another Australian Soldier who gave his life to “protect our freedom”. Why are our Soldiers fighting an unwinnable war in Afghanistan? The original pretext was the events of 911.

Covering Lawn With Gravel

911 was a ‘False Flag’ event; its purpose was to allow the power brokers of this world to implement draconian Legislation into our laws, & of other nations. Not Just the ‘Patriot Act’ in America; or the farce of the European Union. Here in Australia similar laws exist, you can be arrested without charge, held without right to Habeas Corpus. The very things our Soldiers are supposedly fighting for. (The so called War On Terror)




It takes only some simple Math to establish that World Trade 1 &2 was brought down by Explosives. Also the little reported Demolition of World Trade 7, a 47 story building that collapsed into its footprint (Basement) in 6.5 seconds. As with buildings 1&2 the buildings fell at almost Terminal Velocity.




If you stood at the top of a building and dropped a Ball Bearing it would accelerate at 30 feet per second per second. The first second 30 feet, the second 60 feet per second the third at 90 feet per second until Terminal Velocity is reached. For a Human Being it’s a bit slower at 120 Miles an hour.


The World Trade Centers fell at very close to Terminal Velocity. It requires that no resistance is encountered for a building to drop that fast. The ‘Pancake Theory / Explanation tells au that each floor hit the one below it and collapsed them into a neat pile of dust and debris most partials no bigger than a marble. Think of a car accident when one slams into the back of another. In each collision energy is lost and the momentum slowed down.


If these buildings collapsed that way we should have seen the central columns standing well above the pile of debris. The 11 seconds that it took for the buildings to fall was close to Terminal velocity. Therefore no resistance was encountered as one floor dropped onto the one below. Therefore the support columns had to be severed all the way down.


Why did Building 7 collapse? How could some minor fires bring a building down in 7 seconds leaving NOTHING standing. No support beams protruding. In no case of fire in any Skyscraper ever (Including one hit buy a Jet) has the building collapsed.


Do the research for yourself, its out there in Peer Reviewed Scientific papers that totally dispose of the official story. None of it stands up under logical scientific scrutiny. Now we remember the attack on Afghanistan was a direct result of 911. The Military response, over 2000 Soldiers lives lost, thousands of innocent civilians. The war in Iraq was started over the supposed presence of Weapons of Mass Destruction, 4000+ Soldiers lives and over a Million Iraqi lives. 

Our Responsibility

Total cost of these 2 wars, One Trillion $USD, both wars started under false pretences. If you care to look at the circumstances of the 7/7 London Bombings it’s a similar mess of unsubstantiated ‘evidence’ pointing to Muslim extremists, the Laws introduced in the UK are Archaic they have cameras & microphones on every corner. Similar laws that remove the rights we have spent in WW1 & WW2 all the thousand years of developing Parliamentary systems of Government to remove the tyranny of centralized power.


We want Liberty not Democracy, Democracy as Thomas Jefferson stated was “2 Wolves and a Sheep voting on what to have for dinner” Liberty is a very different creature, a Bill of Rights being a central component.


Here on the 11th Sept 2010 we stand on the brink of the confluence of forces. The destruction of the free market and the removal of the rights of individuals to the most basic Liberty. Hitler followed the same course of actions we have seen demonstrated since 911. (The roots of the agenda of Global Government go back at least a Century)
Create an enemy, create fear, and introduce laws to ‘Protect ‘the’ Democracy. We now have lost and loosing all that these Wars were supposedly fought to protect.


Wake up! The Global Financial Crisis was started to rob you, to destroy the value of the paper promises we call Money, the false flag events have taken the liberty’s written into our Constitutions and basic Human Rights. Its not just America. We here in Australia were disarmed after the False Flag event of Port Arthur; a small number of Soldiers could take control of our Cities overnight.


History tells us that nobody has ever won a war in Afghanistan; it is a killing ground of Army’s for thousands of years. We have no excuse to be there, 911 and the people behind that atrocity are the enemy any they already are in power. Kevin Rudd took on the Mining Corporations, he found out the he was no longer PM. I believe we lost / began loosing our sovereignty. The disappearance of Harold Holt.

For your children’s sake do not dismiss the seemingly Science Fiction / Conspiracy theories. Hitler’s rise to power and extermination of millions in camps was somebody’s conspiracy Theory. Had you tried to convince a person in the early 1930’s of Hitler’s agenda (even though he wrote it down) the Tin Foil Hat would have been handed to you, in those days perhaps a Metal Helmet?


What better way to take control of a population than to make anybody who questions it, regardless of the evidence they present, be made to be though a crank, nut job. Australians used to take pride in teaching your Son to use a Rifle, we are a small population and like the Swiss the Population, armed and trained is the best Defense. From Foreign and our own Government’s efforts to control and eventually enslave,


Slavery is a strong term, its not required to have Manacles and Whips, Slavery is first placed upon the mind to resist free thinking, into the schools to remove certain books from the Library’s or better still never buy them.


If not for the Internet we would now be exposed to the full horror of what is already been done in our name; ‘for our protection’ the WWW was not planned for by the Shadow Governments, millions of people know the truth and the magnitude of what has already been achieved to control the population (and reduce it) . We have the Web to thank for a reprieve, any attempt to Censor the Web should be resisted with extreme prejudice available to the Citizen within the law as it presently stands.


Read Below for a tiny sample of the proof of the lie of 911, then research it, talk to other people; most won’t listen. They usually change the subject very quickly. I fear that we will not have sufficient people awake to the life & death situation we face. If you have children then you have even more reason to take a few hours and you will feel the sickening feeling I felt. The same feeling that many Jews in the early days of Hitler’s Germany. “No that cannot be true, its absurd, people would never let it happen”


Guess what, you are the people and you are letting it happen, this is more important than the Grand Final.


Have you noticed that in the World outside of the quietly sleeping citizens of Australia Liberty is being disassembled. The growth of Corporate power, the lack of alternative choices in our Elections. Would it matter a hair if Labor or Liberal won the Election.


==============================================================


The Open Chemical Physics Journal
Volume 2
ISSN: 1874-4125
Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007


Abstract
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.


"The holy Quran tells us that 'God guides us to the truth.' My commitment to you tonight is to speak that truth, and to leave you with extremely valuable science-based information. It's the responsibility of us, the non-Muslim American citizens, to take the greater risks and to counter the lies that we've highlighted tonight in the official conspiracy theory surrounding this major catalyzing event that has led to even greater atrocities in the Muslim world. On behalf of non-Muslim Americans, I would like to personally apologize for not having yet accomplished enough toward these ends. Speaking on behalf of the 5,000 members of AE911Truth, we promise to do our very best to bring out the truth. Muslims of the world deserve an apology from the real 9/11 perpetrators, their supporters, and non-Muslims who refuse to even look at this scientific evidence. We wish that it was safer for Muslims to be publicly active, but we understand that this is an unfair request — given the post 9/11 political environment. If together, we are successful, you and your Muslim brothers and sisters around the world will no longer have to continually look over your shoulders."




The scientific paper Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe conclusively shows the presence of unignited aluminothermic explosives in dust samples from the Twin Towers, whose chemical signature matches previously documented aluminothermic residues found in the same dust samples. The present review of the paper and related research is intended to summarize those findings for the non-technical reader. To that end, I first provide a short introduction to the subject of aluminothermic explosives, then outline the methods and results of analysis of the dust samples, and finally explore the significance of these findings.


Energetic Nanocomposites
The term 'nano-thermite' applied to the unignited thermitic material discovered in World Trade Center dust is potentially misleading because it doesn't capture the complexity and sophistication of this material or its known analogs. Perhaps a better term is energetic nanocomposites, a class of materials that has been used by the military for some time in applications spanning propellants, armor-piercing munitions, and reactive armor. In their diverse roles, energetic nanocomposites fulfill a range of requirements including: "high density, good mechanical properties, low sensitiveness, good stability, low cost, ease of manufacturing, and environmental acceptability." [4] To achieve these requirements, scientists developing advanced aluminothermic materials have learned to embed the fine powders in a carbon- and silicon-rich matrix. Kevin Ryan explains
The discovery of unexploded super-thermite in the WTC dust augments a large body of evidence pointing to the use of aluminothermic materials in the destruction of the skyscrapers. The present review looks only at the evidence of explosives found in the dust and debris expelled from the Twin Towers.
Even before WTC dust was subjected to the kind of microscopic scrutiny described in Active Thermitic Material Discovered, several features of the dust analysis published by the USGS pointed to the use of aluminothermics. For example, the USGS data shows high levels of barium -- a fact that is difficult to explain, barring pyrotechnics. The high levels of iron and aluminum in the dust -- each ranging from 1.3 to 4.1 percent of the dust samples by weight -- also appears anomalous, although prosaic sources of the metals can be imagined.

Australia was disarmed by a “Black Operation”

Australia was disarmed by a “Black Operation”, in 1996 an Individual Martin Bryant , a ‘Lone Gunman’ managed to kill over 30 people most with single kill shots to the head or Heart, the Gunman left only a half dozen wounded in this 15 minute killing spree.

It is very difficult to kill a person with a single shot , most of the ‘Massacres’ have ratios of 7 dead 15 wounded or similar.
The ‘Patsy’ was Martin Briant, a low IQ and unstable personality, he had never had SAS training or similar. Yet he managed to do single handedly what would probably take two highly trained persons. He also used a Rifle that he was not familiar with.
The result of the incident at Port Arthur an isolated Tourist spot in Tasmania (The local Police had been called to the other side of the area 30 Mins away on a bogus Heroin bust. In that time this Left Handed untrained person killed without interruption.

Australians Gun laws were on the strength of this ‘atrocity’ changed to require all owners of Full & Semi automatic Rifles and Shotguns. The owners were compensated and many collectors watched as their guns were Hydraulically crushed and tossed on a scrap pile.

This was not the end over the years we Australians have lost the right to own Cross Bows, Swords and new Legislation now allows Police to search anybody for Knives without probable cause.

The Port Arthur Massacre was a dry run for disarming a population. We Australians are a very Apathetic lot, 911 a hoax? Oh yea man so what doesn’t effect us. We as a Nation could be placed under Marshal Law or Invaded without a shot fired.
Martin Bryant was given a choice, Life without Parole and no contact with his family or a Guilty Plea that would place him in a Psychiatric Institution.

The information below is about how a "Lone Gunman" managed to kill 30+ people with mostly single kill shots to Head or Heart.. Police conveniently called to a bogus Heroin Bust.

The incident gave the Australian Government the excuse to diss-arm the Public. Now we cannot even carry a pocket Knife & subject to search by Police without cause.

I believe Australia has a purpose to the Globalists, I refuge for them with a docile gullible population that has no memory of hard times and the price of Liberty.

At this time we have no government at all. Like the UK a Hung Parliament will result. Australia is controlled by the Corporations as our X_ PM Kevin Rudd found out when he tried to Tax them beyond what they wished to pay.

The author OF THE MATERIAL BELOW Joe Vialls

ELAPSED TIME 15 SECONDS......... Next the very professional gunman moved towards the area of the souvenir shop and killed Nicole Burgess with a shot to the head.
Then Mrs Elizabeth Howard through the chest and arm with fatal consequences.
Swiveling around, the gunman killed Mr Leslie Lever with a shot to the head, and killed Mrs Gwenda Neader with another shot to the head.
Temporarily distracted, he fired back into the cafe area and wounded Mr Peter Crosswell, turning again he shot Mr Jason Winter twice, killing him with a shot to the head.

On his way back to the souvenir area the gunman wounded Mr Dennis Olson, then proceeded to the kill-zone near the locked door where he killed Mr Ronald Jary, Pauline Masters, and Mr Peter Nash, all of them with single shots to the head.
At this stage the gunman had killed twenty and wounded another twelve with 29 rounds,he then stopped firing and changed magazines in a most professional way.
The magazine fitted to the AR15 held 30 rounds total, so by changing magazines after firing only 29 shots the gunman ensured that he still had a live round in the breech in case anyone moved, enabling him to kill that person instantly if caught unawares.

THE PORT ARTHUR MASSACRE CONSPIRACY

"No action can really be understood apart from motive which prompted it." Arthur Schopenhauer. 1851.

It was more than the media frenzy that saturated the tabloids with sensationalism and emotional hype. The never-ending tirade of media concentration on the private lives of people who should have been left to grieve in peace was a lead up to the Prime Minister's staggering announcement to enforce new gun laws.
MURDER WEAPON HANDED IN DURING PREVIOUS AMNESTY

On the 23rd of June 1996 the Sunday Telegraph published a story about a gun collector in Victoria who identified the AR15 rifle used for the Port Arthur killings as one that he had handed in to police during an amnesty in February 1993. Strange that the weapon used in the killings just happened to fall off a conveyor belt on the way to the smelters.

”As I was to find out later, after reading what is left of Bryant's original interview, at no time has he admitted to being at Port Arthur on that day even after extensive questioning. In fact he admitted to several other incriminating events and a full confession would have made no difference to the trouble he was already in.

Even though Bryant had not been identified in any police lineup as the gunman, outrage against this man was akin to the old wild west lynch mobs. I just couldn't forget the trouble that the media went to profile Bryant, from enhancing of his photograph to make him look like a wild-eyed Manson maniac to the innuendos that his house was an arsenal for military weapons. All of this made finding an impartial jury almost impossible - perhaps that was the idea.”

TRIAL BY MEDIA ENSURED NO TRIAL BY JURY

Martin Bryant's trial was not by jury but rather by media and when he pleaded 'not guilty' the commotion that this caused indicated to me that this was not what the judicial system had in mind. In fact his plea was refused.

Bryant re-emerged at another hearing and this time pleaded guilty but strangely laughed as the names of the dead were read out. Now, if this wasn't the actions of a deranged man then perhaps it was the reaction of an innocent one. Perhaps the actions of a man who had tried to plead not guilty because, despite his instructions, he knew that this was not right. Perhaps a man who was forced to change his plea in order to satisfy the lust of the public and now found only irony in the legal system that was railroading him.

The media told us that it was obvious that Bryant was the assassin and therefore it would only cause more distress to the victims of Port Arthur if a trial by jury forced them onto the stand to testify. Never mind that another man's life was at stake. The headlines told us that he could "Rot In Hell". Never mind whether he was guilty or not. Trial or no trial everyone agreed that this eccentric half wit performed the single most devastating killing spree of the century in a style and manner that defied all reasonable explanation.


These articles eventually built into a book which he has published called DEADLY DECEPTION AT PORT ARTHUR and contains an in-depth investigation into a conspiracy almost beyond belief but backed up with scientific evidence which cannot be refuted.

Probably arising from the same "gut feelings" that I had, various other people have begun their own investigations.. Many of these investigators are amateurs in some capacity. Either having no previous experience with investigative work or very little writing ability. Their styles and avenues of discovery have come from different directions and may even conflict with each other but there is one thing that they all seem to have in common.

”They all come to the same conclusion and agree that the Port Arthur massacre was staged for a purpose and a government cover-up has resulted in the incarceration of a man who was not the murderer of 35 innocent victims on that fateful day.”

From the wealth of information gathered on these pages it is up to the reader to determine for themselves whether the traitors who disarmed our country should be allowed to get away with it.
From “ Who Ordered The Port Arthur Masssacar?”

1. On the Sunday morning, two hours before the murders, ten of the senior managers of Port Arthur were taken to safety many miles away up the east coast,for a two day seminar with a vague agenda and no visiting speakers. Was the timing of this trip a mere coincidence?

2. Also just before the shootings the only two policemen in the region were called away on a wild goose chase. They were sent to the Coal Mine at Salt Water River, to investigate a heroin drug stash which turned out to be soap powder. This was too far for them to get to the Broad Arrow Cafe in time to be of any use. Had a policeman remained at Dunalley he would have closed the swing bridge to prevent the killer(s) from escaping from the peninsula. Did Bryant, IQ 66, organise this decoy?

3. Big Mortuary Truck. Before the massacre, a specially-built 22 person capacity mortuary truck was built. It attracted some derision at the time, but its effective use at Port Arthur was unquestioned. After the massacre it was advertised, unsuccessfully, for sale via the internet, then converted for another purpose. Without the foresight of Port Arthur, why build it? When it had proven its worth, why get rid of it? Another coincidence?

4. Martin Bryant has never been properly identified as the gunman. A young woman who ate her lunch near the gunman just before 1.30 said he had a freckled face. Graham Collyer, the wounded ex-soldier, who had the best opportunity to observe the killer, said he had a pock-marked or acned face. Neither description fits Bryant who has a beautifully smooth complexion. Graham Collyer says that it was not Bryant who shot him in the neck.

5. Illegal Photo. On 30th April the Hobart Mercury printed a week old photo of Martin Bryant on the front page. This was illegal because at that stage some of the witnesses had not yet been asked to identify the killer, and the photo would have become fixed in the minds of the witnesses. When one witness was asked to describe the clothing worn by the gunman, she described the clothing on the photo instead of what the gunman had worn. The Mercury newspaper was not prosecuted for breaking the law.

6. Mrs Wendy Scurr, nurse, tour guide and Ambulance Officer, rang the police at 1.32 pm to report the shooting. She and other medics then cared for the injured and the dead without any police protection for six and a half hours. Who ordered the armed police to stop at Tarana, where they had a barbecue? The police who arrived by boats were a stone's throw away from the main crime scene, the cafe, and they too failed to come in to see what was going on. Was this meant to increase the trauma of the survivors?

7. Three more shots were fired at Port Arthur at 6.30pm while Bryant was at Seascape. Who fired those shots?

8. Same Question - Different Answer. At a recent Forensics Seminar in Queensland where the Tasmanian Police forensic gun inspector, Gerard Dutton, gave a lecture, the first question came from Mr Ian McNiven. He asked if there was any empirical evidence to link Martin Bryant to the Broad Arrow Cafe. Sargent Dutton immediately closed the 15 minute question time and would not reply. When McNiven managed to say "I have here Graham Collyer's police statement...", Sgt Dutton threatened him with arrest and called for security agents to escort McNiven out of the building. When Dutton was asked the same question in America by a Doctor at an American seminar, he replied truthfully - "There is no empirical evidence to link Bryant to the cafe".

9. Yet a police video tape exists which proves that the police had an excellent opportunity to get DNA samples and finger prints of the gunman. The video briefly shows the blue sports bag on a cafe table. The gunman had carried his 3 rifles in this bag and left it right next to his drinking glass, his Solo soft drink can, knife, fork, plate, video cameras, etc. Why did the police fail to take DNA samples and finger prints?

10. According to the official story, Bryant first killed David and Sally Martin at Seascape Cottage in the morning, then went on to Port Arthur. Yet two policemen have reported seeing a naked woman with black hair, screaming and running from one building to another at Seascape well into the afternoon. If Sally Martin was dead, who was this woman?

11. Proof of other gunmen in Seascape Cottage. While Bryant was calmly talking to police by telephone in the cottage during the 'siege' and the conversation was recorded, someone else fired an SKK rifle 20 times. In the transcript the gunfire is recorded as 'coughs' but an electronic analysis of one of the 'coughs' shows that it was an SKK shot.

12. Two More Very Handy Seminars. On the Sunday morning, some 25 specialist doctors (Royal Australian College of Surgeons) from all over Australia had attended a training course in Hobart, and their last lecture was on Terrorist Attack and Gunshot Wounds. They stayed on to take care of the wounded victims.

13. Also, more than 700 reporters from 17 nations came to a seminar in Hobart. They were asked to arrive during the week-end as the seminar was due to begin early on Monday morning. How handy to have 700 scribblers churning out their anti-gun and disarmament propaganda to the whole world!

14. "There will never be uniform Gun Laws in Australia until we see a massacre somewhere in Tasmania", said Barry Unsworth, NSW Premier, December, 1987 at a conference in Hobart. Prophecy or Planning?

15. "If we don't get it right this time (gun laws) next time there is a massacre, and there will be, then they'll take all our guns off us", said the deputy prime minister, Tim Fischer in May 1996. Who is the "THEY" who would order the removal of our guns? Did Fischer let slip that gun confiscation has been ordered by someone other than our own leaders?

16. No Respect for the Law. Our laws demand that a Coronial Inquiry must take place (a) when foreign nationals are killed (b) when anyone dies in a fire John Howard acted illegally when he ordered the Coronial Inquiry to be abandoned.

17. It is evident that the massacre was planned to happen on the ferry which sailed to the Isle of the Dead every day. The victims were to be eighty elderly American tourists who had come in two coaches. But the plan went awry because the sailing time of the ferry had changed from 1.30 to
2.00 pm.

All the preparations were made for a 1.30 massacre, so the killer began his work at the Broad Arrow Cafe at 1.30, instead of on the ferry at 2.00.